A Ey Bs.
Pr
Ae UIA DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
fag oe oe
Alida i ei dee SHOW LORE BLAM A) RRC CILRE RE
m ote!
ee! 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 100%
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO4625-14
17 November 2014
Thig is in reference to your application for correction to your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13
November 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also
considered. the advisory opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval
Personnel memo 5420 Ser 833/1898 of 29 Sept 2014, a copy of which was
provided to you on 14 October 2014, and is being provided to you now.
Additionally, you also requested a personal appearance before the
Board. The Board members considered your request for a personal
appearance, however, they found that the igsue in the case was
adequately documented and that a personal appearance with or without
counsel would-not materially add to the Board’s understanding of the
issues involved. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has
been denied.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence suomitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon reques7.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
Docket NOo.NKU4S62b~-14
this case. In this regard, it is iviportant to keep im mind tual a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
of 8
meee Tae
Dik “ys i
% Zu - J!
ROBERT J; ONEILL
Ke Executive Director
fe
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3974 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased father’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR3974-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3452 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record: and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making 4ts...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5773 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3348 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and revcedures applicable to the proceedings oF 8» Board. New evidence is evidence the Board prior to making its decision ep in mind that you are entitl reconsider its year from the date of the Bo not previously considered by in this case. rrection...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3933 14
“tn addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion Furnished by CNRFC ltr 5420 Ser wi/osss5 of 25 Aug 14, a copy of which is attached, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board found that NAVADMIN 203/09 published in June 2009 provided the procedures members are required to follow to transfer the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3450 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 4 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR3450-14 ay 4 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to iemanieaee the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9951 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval - Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2014. After careiul and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material | error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8308 14
However, you allege that you did not receive a copy of the partially favorable advisory opinion (2/0), since you did not agree with the approval dates. As explained in the Board’s previous partial approval letter, a case may only be reconsidered upon submission of new and material evidence. On 14 July 2014, your reconsideration request was approved.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3204 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3204-14 n official naval Consequently, when applying for a correction of a istence of record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ex probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3861 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.